{"id":226,"date":"2009-06-01T00:01:39","date_gmt":"2009-06-01T08:01:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/edutechdebate.org\/?p=226"},"modified":"2012-09-27T10:37:05","modified_gmt":"2012-09-27T14:37:05","slug":"mobile-phones-better-learning-tools-than-computers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/edutechdebate.org\/mobile-phones-and-computers\/mobile-phones-better-learning-tools-than-computers\/","title":{"rendered":"Mobile Phones: Better Learning Tools than Computers?"},"content":{"rendered":"

From the beginning of the computer age, scientists, educators, and policy makers have looked at the computer as an agent of change in education. With its amazing capacity to expand the human mind, by assisting in computation or facilitating exploration – no other technology can rival its data processing abilities. And put to work in education, the computer promises an unparalleled way to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of learning models, and increase the impact of the limited resources allocated to school systems.<\/p>\n

Beginning with innovators like Seymour Papert, and extending through the One Laptop Per Child program, which claimed to be a direct descendant of his work, there is an additional push to move computers to a one-to-one basis with children. That computers could actually supplant the top-down knowledge transfer usually practiced to a more self-directed exploration of knowledge. But reliant on one-to-one computer saturation, this specialized effort has always been restrained by the massive costs to allocate and support such technology diffusion.<\/p>\n

But why have a monolithic focus on computers? What about mobile phones?<\/b><\/p>\n

Today there is a mobile phone revolution in the developing world. From the rural Maasai to the slum dwellers of Mumbai, poor people are acquiring mobile phones by themselves – without the government subsidies of the telecenter era. In fact, mobiles represent a huge shifting the technology deployment burden from the state to private companies and individual consumers. <\/p>\n

And yet saturation levels are nearing one-to-one in the developed world already, and gaining quickly in the urban areas of the developing world. Because of their relative low costs and low operating needs, its now a given that mobile phones will always out number computers. In addition, phones are gaining in capacity and computing power, with high-end smart phones rivaling some of the low-end netbooks already. <\/p>\n

Could it be that mobile phones offer developing country governments a better learning tool and more educational benefits that computers?<\/b><\/p>\n

This month, we will have two respected discussants explore this topic:<\/p>\n

Dr. Robert B. Kozma<\/a>
\nDr. Kozma has directed or co-directed more than 25 projects that have examined the impact of ICT on teaching and learning and developed advanced computer environments for education.<\/p>\n

Michael Trucano<\/a>:
\nMike Trucano is the World Bank’s Senior ICT and Education Policy Specialist, providing support to World Bank education projects with ICT-related ‘components’, and is involved in a variety of research activities.<\/p>\n

Please join us for what we all expect to be a lively and informative conversation – your input can start right now.<\/p>\n

\n

Don’t miss a moment of the action!<\/h2>\n

Subscribe now and get the latest articles from Educational Technology Debate sent directly to your inbox.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Numerous initiatives, most prominently the One Laptop Per Child program, seek to introduce computers to students around the globe. Yet, are computers the right technology for ICT in education? Perhaps mobile phones, of which the ITU estimates there are 4.1 billion subscriptions, would provide a better technology for students? For teachers and policy-makers seeking to increase educational outcomes with inexpensive digital devices, do computers or mobile phones offer a better ICT investment?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[49],"tags":[59,51,60,16,56,57,58],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/edutechdebate.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/edutechdebate.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/edutechdebate.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/edutechdebate.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/edutechdebate.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=226"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/edutechdebate.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2531,"href":"https:\/\/edutechdebate.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226\/revisions\/2531"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/edutechdebate.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=226"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/edutechdebate.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=226"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/edutechdebate.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=226"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}