Technology is powered by Electricity, which is a challenge to most of rural Africa.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nThe bloggers reflections<\/b><\/p>\n
The future of ICT\/Mobile deployment in mLearning is encouraging, however, this cannot be substituted for a weak education system \u2013 a good quality education sector is vital. It should be understood that ICT\/Mobile is just a tool or an enabler to development. Success stories and failures aside, we need to be unambiguous about the definition of M-learning which varies from country to country. I believe the biggest opportunities lie in the access to information and knowledge. <\/p>\n
In my outlook, many of the mLearning initiatives are designed within a \u2018\u2019what if\u2019\u2019 scenario: “What if everyone in rural Africa has access to a smart phone and\/ or has access to internet?”<\/i> The fact of the matter is that, inspite the rapid growth of the mobile industry; we need to use that which is currently available and practical. In most parts of Africa, we are limited to SMS, and Voice; this is the only medium that works on most basic devices. Teaching how to read, write and to do simple arithmetic is the responsibility of the parents, teacher and the government. It is complex to replace that by applications and mobile technology. I encourage that ICT or mobile should always be used as an enabler and could never be successful if it is used in isolation.<\/p>\n
Mobile operators could encompass the role of an incubator; where a commercially viable product is introduced that will encourage the deployment and uptake of the other operators. Competition drives innovation. It is undeniable that operators are an enabler of technology with good network coverage and infrastructure their primary role. Text to change has partnerships with most major mobile operators in East Africa from which we get subsidized tariffs. Our short codes run on all networks in Uganda, Kenya and Tanzania. <\/p>\n
For example, Orange is providing us with technical support in countries where they have operations; however, the partnership does not demand exclusivity- we are open to work with other existing operators within the region. I then must argue that Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is always a short term association. To have a sustainable working relationship with the mobile operators we must ensure a win- win situation since the primary goal \/ core business of the operator is to provide network services and make profits. This is how it should be. I rather have premium services and pay for it than a CSR project that doesn\u2019t have priority for the service provider because it is not profitable.<\/p>\n
Very many pilots in developing countries are currently donor funded and have created vast impact. The question is if they are successful, why then doesn\u2019t the government take them on and scale them up nationwide? It is a pity to say that if the government does not scale them up then we remain in a pilot cycle. <\/p>\n
The role of government (education ministries) can never be over emphasized. Development of a strong regulatory framework involving a range of stakeholders with accent on end user involvement will bring us far. For example, in Uganda a technical e-readiness working group is in place with the aim to bring different stakeholders together to accelerate ICT implementations in Uganda. A national ICT policy is in place and an education sector ICT policy is before Cabinet. The Ministry of Education and Sports is taking steps to co-ordinate ICT development and has allocated resources to support implementation of its ICT strategy. <\/p>\n
Nationwide deployment of a mLearning application programme could only be successful with the inclusion of government having a dedicated budget. That said, mLearning applications have the potential to improve and strengthen the current Education system if integrated into an existing \u2018well functioning\u2019 Education system. It is interesting to ask \u2018\u2019If the paper based system works; why replace it by mobile phones? \u2018\u2019<\/p>\n
The fact that Mobile is the most widely used technology in Africa and more people have access to a phone than a computer or even to good quality educational material offers vast opportunities for mLearning. <\/p>\n
Recommendations to policy makers, regulators and other stakeholders<\/b><\/p>\n
My 2 cents lie in the need to develop a legal regulatory framework, mobilize resources to support development of programmes and applications for mLearning. The Ministry should also directly support the development of mLearning applications and or innovations. In addition, the use and deployment of proved programmes and applications in the Education sector.<\/p>\n
Before supporting more pilots, donors should research on what already exists; what has worked and what hasn\u2019t. This will help cub duplication. Since most pilots are funded externally, therefore, we need to be creative in sourcing funds and build new business models to ensure continuity. The role of government and other private sector parties cannot be undermined to ensure continuity or sustainability of the pilot projects after the donor has exited. However, we need to be mindful that the MLearning project objectives should therefore be able to meet the countries\u2019 development goals to attract continual implementation by government. <\/p>\n
Public private partnerships in the mobile industry need to be encouraged. Tax on Mobile technology, especially on mobile devices is very high in East Africa. In Uganda the VAT on Mobile products is high at 30%. A recent report on the GSMA shows that mobile subscribers across East Africa are highly taxed the world over. This has to be lowered to encourage mobile deployment in Africa. In order to encourage mLearning, the government needs to be creative with tax incentives that will encourage service providers to engage without incurring losses. <\/p>\n
\n
Don’t miss a moment of the action!<\/h2>\n
Subscribe now and get the latest articles from Educational Technology Debate sent directly to your inbox.<\/p>\n