{"id":473,"date":"2009-10-07T09:45:25","date_gmt":"2009-10-07T13:45:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/edutechdebate.org\/?p=473"},"modified":"2012-09-27T10:37:34","modified_gmt":"2012-09-27T14:37:34","slug":"sustaining-rather-than-sustainable-ict4e","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/edutechdebate.org\/ict4e-sustainability\/sustaining-rather-than-sustainable-ict4e\/","title":{"rendered":"Sustaining Rather than Sustainable ICT4E"},"content":{"rendered":"

As a child, whenever I asked my mother what a word meant she would respond without fail, \u201cLook it up!\u201d She almost always knew the meaning but wanted me to seek the answer on my own. To this day I have a healthy fascination with language and I can\u2019t help but wonder if it was somehow fostered by my mother\u2019s insistence that I comb through the dictionary looking for definitions.<\/p>\n

So when considering what sustainability means in the context of Information and Communication Technology for Education (ICT4E) I find myself wanting first to understand what it means for something \u2013 anything \u2013 to be sustainable. I\u2019m not sure if what we had while I was growing up was a Merriam-Webster dictionary, but this is what that venerable publication offers up:<\/p>\n

sustainable \u2013 capable of being sustained<\/em><\/p>\n

As you can see, that definition isn\u2019t very helpful, but if we dig a little deeper we get (among other definitions):<\/p>\n

sustain \u2013 keep up, prolong<\/em><\/p>\n

So something that is sustainable can be kept up or prolonged. This definition is consistent with the common understanding of sustainability in development programs. Generally, one of the explicit goals of such programs is to establish a system \u2013 security, governmental, financial, healthcare \u2013 that is capable of continuing to function effectively after external support has been diminished or withdrawn.<\/p>\n

.
\nOpportunity, Capacity, Motivation<\/strong><\/p>\n

But before we get to what it means for an ICT4E program to be sustainable I\u2019d like to unpack this idea of sustainability just a little bit more and consider what the necessary elements are of an effective system. After all, as Wayan points out in his introduction, we\u2019re working within an \u201ceducational ecosystem,\u201d a complex web of interconnected people and processes.<\/p>\n

In order to do that I\u2019d like to draw on a framework from a completely different area, but one that I think will help to structure this discussion. It\u2019s not perfect, but it will help establish my main point. The framework is a general one used in developing human resources for health (HRH) \u2013 an area I\u2019m familiar with given my work at Jhpiego<\/a> \u2013 and it\u2019s pretty basic. In order to produce and maintain effective human resources you need to have an enabling environment that includes the opportunity to provide services, competent human resource capacity and motivation.<\/p>\n

\"circles\"<\/center>
.<\/p>\n
    \n
  • Opportunity:<\/em> Service providers need to have the chance to provide the services they\u2019re expected to (this is particularly important in a task-shifting setting where one cadre will be taking on responsibilities normally associated with another). This is also extended to include things like physical infrastructure and commodities. It\u2019s hard to do your job at all, let alone well, if there\u2019s nowhere to do it and you lack the necessary tools.<\/li>\n
  • Capacity:<\/em> Service providers will also need education or training to develop the knowledge, skills and attitudes they need to perform their jobs to at least safe, beginning-level competency.<\/li>\n
  • Motivation:<\/em> Service providers, like the rest of us, need to have a reason to use the new competencies they\u2019ve developed and continue doing their job, day after day, and do it well.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    At this point you\u2019re probably wondering, \u201cWhen is this guy going to start talking about ICT4E?\u201d Well, now I think we\u2019re ready. So let\u2019s unwind. What does it look like if we use the Opportunity, Capacity & Motivation framework in the context of ICT4E?<\/p>\n

      \n
    • Opportunity:<\/em> \u201cService providers\u201d \u2013 teachers, faculty, preceptors, etc. \u2013 need to have the chance to make use of and integrate ICT into the learning process. In support of that, the necessary infrastructure needs to be in place including power, hardware and software. Depending on the program, there might also be a need for networking and\/or Internet connectivity. And the providers need to have sufficient access to the resources.<\/li>\n
    • Capacity:<\/em> Service providers also need to be competent and comfortable in the use of ICT for the development, packaging and delivery of learning content and for supporting learning activities. In addition, and just as importantly, there needs to be support in place for the providers \u2013 this could be local ICT staff, shared staff across sites, or even external consultants.<\/li>\n
    • Motivation:<\/em> Service providers need to have a reason to integrate ICT into the learning process. For example, they may feel that the technology can help better educate or train learners.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      But as I mentioned above, this analogy to human capacity development is imperfect. The main reason: it focuses on the \u201cproviders\u201d and does not include the \u201cconsumers.\u201d The consumers in ICT4E are the learners. But we could still apply the Opportunity, Capacity & Motivation framework to them and the details would be largely the same. The consumers need to have access to the infrastructure and opportunities to use it; possess the ability to make effective use of ICT and have support in doing so; and be motivated to participate.<\/p>\n

      .
      \nSustainable ICT4E Systems<\/strong><\/p>\n

      Now that we know what elements are necessary to have an effective ICT4E system, how can we ensure that it\u2019s a sustainable system, one that can be kept up or prolonged? The first two things that come to mind are policy and financing \u2013 both of which can be applied at the national as well as the local, institutional level.<\/p>\n

      At the national level, the Ministry of Education \u2013 or other Ministries, for example the Ministry of Health in the context of healthcare education and training \u2013 can develop and adopt policies that encourage the use and integration of ICT in education and training programs. The appropriate focus at this level is on large infrastructure projects and capacity development.<\/p>\n

      In addition, existing or newly created bodies can concentrate on curriculum development and providing guidance for the integration of ICT at the level of instruction. Funding to support initial implementations in alignment with these policies could then be secured and maintained through any number of mechanisms: taxation, tariffs, bi\/multilateral agreements, development loans, etc.<\/p>\n

      At the institutional level, school policies can be adopted and procedures put in place that are consistent with those policies and guidelines instituted at the national level by the appropriate Ministries and national boards and bodies. And use of the infrastructure developed through national level initiatives can be integrated directly into the learning process. Additional funding for ongoing support of the local ICT infrastructure \u2013 hardware, software, networking, ICT support staff, etc \u2013 can be obtained either through national programs or through creative approaches like fee-for-use models that provide access to ICT resources to the public.<\/p>\n

      But traditional applications of policy and financing only go so far. They work well for ensuring the sustainability of the Opportunity and Capacity elements of the ICT4E system but are largely ineffective at addressing Motivation. As an example from HRH, it has been shown that giving bonuses to healthcare workers leads to short-term improvements in quality of care but ultimately the effect fades over time \u2013 it is not kept up or prolonged, it is not sustainable.<\/p>\n

      Likewise, teachers could be given bonuses, or students could be awarded prizes or provided with some other form of recognition, for their successful and effective use of ICT in learning but that would not lead to sustained behavior.<\/p>\n

      .
      \nMotivation is Key<\/strong><\/p>\n

      For ICT4E initiatives to be sustainable they must meet the needs and desires \u2013 and often the latter more so than the former \u2013 of the \u201cend users,\u201d of the teachers and preceptors that use the technology to teach, demonstrate and facilitate as well as the students that use it to learn, connect and have fun. If the program is not aligned with these prime Motivation components then it must venture into the realm of behavior change.<\/p>\n

      And behavior change is difficult. I\u2019ve learned this the hard way. I\u2019ve left a small trail of failed ICT initiatives in my wake that were unsuccessful not because of the technology but rather because I didn\u2019t have a clear understanding of the culture into which the technology was being introduced, because I didn\u2019t consider Motivation.<\/p>\n

      \"policy\"<\/center>
      .<\/p>\n

      And this brings me back to definitions. I began by trying to find a useful definition of sustainable. This led me to:<\/p>\n

      sustain \u2013 keep up, prolong<\/em><\/p>\n

      But I think there may be a better, more useful definition:<\/p>\n

      sustain \u2013 to supply with sustenance: nourish<\/em><\/p>\n

      We need ICT4E initiatives that promote and support teachers\u2019 desires to teach and students\u2019 desires to learn. We need sustaining rather than sustainable ICT4E.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

      when considering what sustainability means in the context of Information and Communication Technology for Education (ICT4E) I find myself wanting first to understand what it means for something \u2013 anything \u2013 to be sustainable. I\u2019m not sure if what we had while I was growing up was a Merriam-Webster dictionary, but this is what that venerable publication offers up: :sustainable \u2013 capable of being sustained<\/i>. As you can see, that definition isn\u2019t very helpful, but if we dig a little deeper we get (among other definitions): “sustain \u2013 keep up, prolong<\/i>.” So something that is sustainable can be kept up or prolonged. This definition is consistent with the common understanding of sustainability in development programs. Generally, one of the explicit goals of such programs is to establish a system \u2013 security, governmental, financial, healthcare \u2013 that is capable of continuing to function effectively after external support has been diminished or withdrawn<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[204],"tags":[218,221,17,205,44,219,217,220,216],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/edutechdebate.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/473"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/edutechdebate.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/edutechdebate.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/edutechdebate.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/edutechdebate.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=473"}],"version-history":[{"count":14,"href":"https:\/\/edutechdebate.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/473\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2623,"href":"https:\/\/edutechdebate.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/473\/revisions\/2623"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/edutechdebate.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=473"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/edutechdebate.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=473"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/edutechdebate.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=473"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}